The importance of creating the right conditions for group intervision sessions among medical residents- a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The burnout rates among residents urge for adequate interventions to improve resilience and prevent burnout. Peer reflection, also called group intervision sessions, is a potentially successful intervention to increase the resilience of young doctors. We aimed to gain insight into the perceived added value of intervision sessions and the prerequisite conditions to achieve this, according to residents and intervisors. Our insights might be of help to those who think of implementing intervision sessions in their institution. METHODS: An explorative, qualitative study was performed using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with both residents (n = 8) and intervisors (n = 6) who participated in intervision sessions in a university medical center in the Netherlands. The topic list included the perceived added value of intervision sessions and factors contributing to that. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. Thematic analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS: According to residents and intervisors, intervision sessions contributed to personal and professional identity development; improving collegiality; and preventing burn-out. Whether these added values were experienced, depended on: (1) choices made during preparation (intervisor choice, organizational prerequisites, group composition, workload); (2) conditions of the intervision sessions (safety, depth, role of intervisor, group dynamics, pre-existent development); and (3) the hospital climate. CONCLUSIONS: Intervision sessions are perceived to be of added value to the identity development of medical residents and to prevent becoming burned out. This article gives insight in conditions necessary to reach the added value of intervision sessions. Optimizing preparation, meeting prerequisite conditions, and establishing a stimulating hospital climate are regarded as key to achieve this.

Recurrent Cancer Is Associated With Dissatisfaction With Care-A Longitudinal Analysis Among Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal impact of a recurrence of gynecological cancer on satisfaction with information provision and care. The secondary aim was to assess the impact of a recurrence on illness perceptions, anxiety, and depression and health-related quality of life. METHODS: This study is a longitudinal analysis from the ROGY Care trial, conducted between 2011 and 2014, including patients with endometrial (n = 215) and ovarian (n = 149) cancer. Patients were invited to complete questionnaires directly after initial treatment and after 6, 12, and 24 months. Satisfaction with information provision and care, illness perceptions, anxiety, and depression were compared before and after the recurrence. Linear mixed-model analyses were conducted to assess the differences in outcomes of patients with a recurrence compared with patients without a recurrence. RESULTS: During 2-year follow-up, 25 patients with endometrial cancer (12%) and 64 patients with ovarian cancer (43%) had recurrent disease, of whom 9 endometrial and 26 ovarian cancer patients completed at least 1 questionnaire after their recurrence was determined. Patients reported lower satisfaction with care after the diagnosis of a recurrence (doctor interpersonal skills, exchange of information between caregivers, and general satisfaction with care) compared with patients without recurrence. In addition, patients reported lower health-related quality of life, more anxiety and depression, and more threatening illness perceptions after diagnosis of a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: After diagnosis of recurrent disease, endometrial and ovarian cancer patients were less satisfied with care compared with patients without a recurrence. Our findings suggest that patients with recurrent cancer are in need of care that is better tailored to their needs.

Fertility-Sparing Management Using Progestin for Young Women with Endometrial Cancer From a Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: For young women with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia (CAH) and endometrial cancer (EC) who choose to preserve fertility, progestin therapy is the mainstay of treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate oncologic and reproductive outcomes associated with progestin therapy among these women from a population-based cancer registry. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of women under age 45 in British Columbia from 2003 to 2015 with CAH or grade I endometrioid EC who used progestins as initial management. Demographics, treatment type, response to treatment, determinants of definitive surgery (hysterectomy), pathologic findings, and obstetrical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 50 women under age 45 with CAH (n = 29) and EC (n = 21). Median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range 25-41), and most were nulliparous (88%) with a median BMI of 32.9 (range 21-70). After 6 months of therapy, 58% of women had persistent disease, and only 35% had full resolution at last follow-up (median 23 months). There were 32 women who had a hysterectomy, including 27 because of persistent/recurrent disease, and 5 who chose surgery despite complete response to progestins. The majority of hysterectomy specimens (85%) had minimal or no residual pathology, even among those with disease on preoperative biopsy. Only 10% of women had successful pregnancies. CONCLUSION: There is a moderate to high risk of persistence of CAH or EC on progestin therapy. However, for those undergoing hysterectomy, the vast majority has low-risk disease confined to the endometrium, implying the possibility of further conservative management of persistent disease.